tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760875.post7558804635531355717..comments2023-11-02T10:29:04.103+00:00Comments on Egyptology News: Hieroglyphs found recent in Great Pyramid are numbersAndiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03342690442454499340noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760875.post-64192668050246314632011-12-22T03:23:01.060+00:002011-12-22T03:23:01.060+00:00Look at any hieratic chart, and you will easily se...Look at any hieratic chart, and you will easily see that the red markings are NOT the number 121.EnochsScribehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07145589964278783280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760875.post-21021711642391533672011-06-09T19:10:16.632+01:002011-06-09T19:10:16.632+01:00Yes, it was measured by the Rover robot (63.3m), a...Yes, it was measured by the Rover robot (63.3m), and now by the Djedy robot: 63.6m +/-0.4m (ASAE). These measures correspond to about 121 cubits.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760875.post-59003418283282221022011-06-09T13:30:52.103+01:002011-06-09T13:30:52.103+01:00It's great that the marking inside the shaft h...It's great that the marking inside the shaft has been identified as "121 cubits" but it begs the question "Is the shaft 121 cubits long?" Has anyone measured to check?Tony Holmeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08165932601652674609noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6760875.post-51802796797437627542011-06-09T13:29:19.994+01:002011-06-09T13:29:19.994+01:00It is great that the markings have been identified...It is great that the markings have been identified. Hieratic numbers would have been used by the builders. The translation as '121 cubits' begs the question "Is the shaft 121 long?"Tony Holmeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08165932601652674609noreply@blogger.com