Thursday, December 27, 2007

Egyptian plans to copyright antiquities

BBC

Egypt's MPs are expected to pass a law requiring royalties be paid whenever copies are made of museum pieces or ancient monuments such as the pyramids.

Zahi Hawass, who chairs Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, told the BBC the law would apply in all countries.

The money was needed to maintain thousands of pharaonic sites, he said.

Correspondents say the law will deal a blow to themed resorts across the world where large-scale copies of Egyptian artefacts are a crowd-puller.

Mr Hawass said the law would apply to full-scale replicas of any object in any museum in Egypt.


AFP

In a potential blow to themed resorts from Vegas to Tokyo, Egypt is to pass a law requiring payment of royalties whenever its ancient monuments, from the pyramids to the sphinx, are reproduced.

Zahi Hawass, the charismatic and controversial head of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, told AFP on Tuesday that the move was necessary to pay for the upkeep of the country's thousands of pharaonic sites.

"The new law will completely prohibit the duplication of historic Egyptian monuments which the Supreme Council of Antiquities considers 100-percent copies," he said.

"If the law is passed then it will be applied in all countries of the world so that we can protect our interests," Hawass said.

He said that a ministerial committee had already agreed on the law which should be passed in the next parliamentary session, while insisting the move would not hurt Egyptian artisans.

"It is Egypt's right to be the only copyright owner for these monuments in order to benefit financially so we can restore, preserve and protect Egyptian monuments."

However, the law "does not forbid local or international artists from profiting from drawings and other reproductions of pharaonic and Egyptian monuments from all eras -- as long as they don't make exact copies."


Egyptian Gazette

N.B. This story will only be on the above site for a limited period (click the Tourism link).

In a blow to themed resorts from Vegas to Tokyo, Egypt is to pass a law requiring payment of royalties whenever its ancient monuments, from the Pyramids to the Sphinx, are reproduced. Zahi Hawass, the head of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, told AFP that the move was necessary to pay for the upkeep of the country's thousands of pharaonic sites." The new law will completely prohibit the duplication of historic Egyptian monuments which the Supreme Council of Antiquities considers 100-per cent copies," he said." If the law is passed then it will be applied in all countries of the world so that we can protect our interests," Hawass said. He said that a ministerial committee had already agreed on the law which should be passed in the next parliamentary session, while insisting the move would not hurt Egyptian artisans." It is Egypt's right to be the only copyright owner for these monuments in order to benefit financially so we can restore, preserve and protect Egyptian monuments. "However, the law "does not forbid local or international artists from profiting from drawings and other reproductions of pharaonic and Egyptian monuments from all eras -- as long as they don't make exact copies." "Artists have the right to be inspired by everything that surrounds them, including monuments," he said. Asked about the potential impact on the monumental Luxor Hotel in the US gambling capital of Las Vegas, Hawass insisted that that particular resort was "not an exact copy of pharaonic monuments despite the fact it's in the shape of a pyramid." On its website, the luxury hotel describes itself as "the only pyramid shaped building in the world," but Hawass said its interior was entirely different from an ancient Egyptian setting.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Given that you cannot "copyright" retroactively (I am pretty sure Hemiunu and Imhotep are dead now), Hawass' arrogance is growing steadily at its own healthy rate.

However, I would really enjoy the spectacle seeing the Egyptians actually try to enforce this silliness in another country's courts.

Andie said...

On the face of it, it seems a most peculiar idea. It was on a news story on the radio, which I missed but was told about, and it seemed so improbable that I wondered if the news story had been in error, but all the online reports confirm it. As you say - how on earth could it be realistically imposed outside Egypt, and how could it possibly be enforced?

Anonymous said...

I was really hoping, when I saw those articles, that I'd look at the date and see that they were published on April 1.

Oh well, no such luck.

Does anyone know of an online petition people can sign, to show how opposed we are to this ridiculous law?