Thursday, August 07, 2008

Let's all have tickets to the universal museum

Times Online (Ben Macintyre)

The visitors pouring through the doors of the British Museum represent the triumph of an idea born in the white intellectual heat of the Enlightenment - as valuable today as it was 250 years ago when the museum first opened, but now under attack, despite its fabulous success, as never before.

The British Museum is the greatest universal museum in the world. On my first visit there, as a teenager, I remember feeling physically overwhelmed by the sheer scale and variety of the artefacts, art and ideas on display: Mesopotamian relics, Roman statuary, pharaonic carvings, Viking burial treasures.

I wandered, blinking, from room to room. The museum was not trying to tell me something; it seemed to be offering to tell me everything.

That, of course, is why six million people visited the museum last year, from all over the world, free. We flock to the blockbuster exhibitions; but we also come to explore, to fall into unexpected conversations with distant, ancient, foreign peoples.

Bottom of Form

And that, of course, was exactly what the museum's creators imagined when it was founded by Act of Parliament in 1753: a great cornucopia of different civilisations, an encyclopaedic storehouse of universal knowledge, displaying the great cultures side by side, with equal veneration, to enlighten not just an elite, but the world.

That simple, brilliant idea is now under assault from the concept of “cultural property”, part of a worldwide struggle over ownership of the past. In the past half-century, but gathering pace in recent years, so-called “source countries” have successfully begun to reclaim and repatriate artefacts from museums around the world.

The governments of Italy, Greece, Egypt, China, Cambodia and other geographical homes of ancient civilisations argue that antiquities in foreign museums are national property, vital components of national identity that should be returned “home” as a matter of moral urgency.

Zahi Hawass, of Egypt's Supreme Council of Antiquities, insists that objects from Ancient Egypt are “icons of our Egyptian identity [that] should be in the Motherland”. The Greek Government is even more blunt: “Whatever is Greek, wherever in the world, we want back.” Some of the great museums around the world have returned disputed items of questionable provenance. The pressure to surrender the Elgin Marbles grows ever more intense. Some 68 artefacts, including the magnificent 6th-century mixing vessel known as the Euphronios krater, have now been returned to Italy from American museums. Italy displayed the retrieved artefacts at a self-congratulatory exhibition entitled Nostoi, Greek for “homecomings”.


See the above page for the full story.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ben Macintyre is right to remind readers that “the pressure to surrender the Elgin Marbles grows ever more intense.” The New Acropolis Museum opens later this year, and Marbles Reunited, an organisation that campaigns for the reunification of the Parthenon sculptures in Athens, has now appointed a full-time Campaign Director. But Macintyre’s praise for the ideology of the Universal Museum is not going to relieve that pressure, certainly not for the Directors of those very same styled museums.

The criticism now frequently, and erroneously, levelled against those who call for certain antiquities to be returned to the country of origin is that such arguments are emotive and political. And of course when it comes to the past in the present, all one has to do is accuse someone of using the past for political ends and the spectre of the Nazi’s abuse of the past looms - still today, and that person’s claim is immediately discredited. But what Macintyre and others, James Cuno and Neil MacGregor included, fail to acknowledge is that the notion of the British Museum being ‘a museum of the world, for the world’ is as much a political statement as any call for the reunification of the Parthenon sculptures in Athens.

In these grand encyclopaedic museums we do not actually “discover and understand other peoples” in some objective way, as Macintyre suggests. Rather we encounter collections of objects that previous collectors and curators have selected for us to discover and understand, and only part of that collection. For a simple and very obvious example one only has to compare the space given to Africa versus that given to Ancient Europe in the British Museum. The blatant inequality is underwritten not by curatorial constraints, but by politics and ideology. It is an ideology in which Africa is inferior to (western) Europe, an ideology that is reinforced not challenged in the British Museum. As scholars and social commentators have remarked for decades now, a history of the West is often offered up as a history of humanity. In fact, what we have in Bloomsbury then is more a collection of the world, for the West.

Further, Macintyre’s belief that displaying the so-called Elgin Marbles in Beijing, in much the same way that the terracotta Warriors were on display in London, would be a sign that the world accepts the idea of a “pooled cultural legacy” is another example of how flawed the ideology of the Universal Museum is. When a few Terracotta Warriors are loaned to the British Museum, the presence there of these amazing objects is in no way comparable to the presence of the so-called Elgin Marbles in the same place. So the wish that one day this subset of the Parthenon sculptures might leave the British Museum for Beijing as part of some kind of “cultural exchange” is quite simply naive.

Anonymous said...

Just because an object was created in Greece does not make it the property of Greece but rather the property of those who exported it for their own consumption.

We at the Archaeological review believe that the current trend to return to countries of origin objects legally acquired is nonsense, regardless of what yesterday's law was. Poor Egypt will just have to live with what it has left and Greece can save its postcards of marbles long gone and without return.

The hypocrisy of antique empires was on full display last year when the cold generosity of German museum officials offered to return 90 Pharaonic mummies to Egypt and was met with Egypt's Supreme council of antiquities Majordomo's rejection of the mummies. Saying that they were not royal and of no importance.

It would seem that what they want back are the masterpieces not the pollution created by the ancestors who to the great dismay of the leftovers of the antique empires are the forerunners of all mankind and not just of the backwaters of ancient towns.

Italy should be cautious in its hypocrisy as Rome has more ancient Egyptian obelisks than Egypt does mmm. Included in these figures is the obelisk which is said to have been "witness" to the martyrdom of Saint Peter and according to these new ideas belongs back in Egypt.

The sad truth is glory is fleeting and although countries like Egypt and Greece were once great today they are little more than footnotes experiencing sellers remorse.