Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Mummy facing up to more scrutiny

Otago Daily Times

However the Otago Museum's bandage-swathed mummy may have looked 2300 years ago, it certainly wasn't like film star Elizabeth Taylor.

But Taylor's memorable portrayal of Cleopatra in the movie of the same name has left its mark, Dave Wright, the museum's collections, assets and research director, said yesterday - so much so that many people think any female Egyptian mummy would look like her.

The museum will reveal more of its mummy's secrets at its "Egypt Unwrapped" day on January 28.

A non-intrusive CT scan of the mummy at Dunedin Hospital in 2000, which was used to create a three- dimensional computer model, showed the mummified woman was not exactly a raven-haired beauty when she died.

She had only six teeth and was likely to have been racked with pain from severe gum disease, including abscesses.

She was aged about 35 - at a time when many people did not live much beyond 40 - and is believed to have been middle-class.

Carbon-dating of linen from the mummy's wrappings and other analysis shows she lived during the Ptolemaic period (323BC to 30BC).

The mummy was bought in Egypt by Dunedin businessman and philanthropist Bendix Hallenstein and given to the museum in 1893.

1 comment:

Debra Conway said...

I don't understand the constant comparison to actress Elizabeth Taylor. I remember when the film came out long ago and reading where Ms. Taylor did her own eye makeup after studying ancient paintings and statues. Watching the movie even today it is easy to see that her makeup is darker than her own skin tone and the costumes and wigs are of exceptional examples of historically correct clothing.

Perhaps using her name is an attention grabber?