Friday, November 02, 2007

Review: Hawass interview on Al Jazeera

Culture Grrl (Lee Rosenbaum)

A short critical post which highlights an interview from July 2007 on Al Jazeera with Zahi Hawass regarding the repatriation and loan of antiquities which are currently held outside Egypt. The interview can be found in full on You Tube.

On Zahi Hawass' "Wanted" List: "Bust of Prince Ankhhaf," Egyptian, Old Kingdom, 2520-2494 B.C., Boston Museum of Fine Arts

In his revealing Al Jazeera television interview, posted today on ArtsJournal's home page, Zahi Hawass, secretary general of the Egyptian Supreme Council of Antiquities, unintentionally demonstrated why the British Museum; Louvre; Pelizaeus Museum, Hildesheim; Egyptian Museum, Berlin; and Boston Museum of Fine Arts may be justifiably wary about his request that they send their signature ancient artifacts to Egypt for a temporary vacation in their native land.

At one point in the conversation with journalist Riz Khan, Hawass stated:

I want them [the ancient artifacts] to come for a visit for three months, for the opening of the great museum in the shadow of the Pyramid.

But later in the interview, he sounded less the kind host than the potential captor. He forcefully declared:

The Rosetta Stone [the "loan" he desires from the British Museum] is in England. We own that stone. The motherland should own this.

Comments like that are why museums asked to lend coveted objects to repatriation-minded source countries are concerned that once in the bosom of the "motherland," the loans may not get to use their return tickets.

During the interview, Hawass also provided one of those priceless "Did he really say that?" moments. In describing his ongoing row with the St. Louis Art Museum over its 3,200-year-old mummy mask, he confided to Khan:

I even wrote to schools of kids and told them not to go and visit that museum, because there is an artifact that belongs to a country that was stolen and should come back to Egypt.

If your powers of persuasion don't work on the State Department (to which he also wrote), try St. Louis' six-year-olds---schoolyard diplomacy.



2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hello, My name is Ken Hardacre I have visited Egypt on three occasions and as I write I have Peter Tompkins Great Pyramid book next to me and other Egypt books scattered around the house, I understand exactly what Z.H is saying about the need to return the artifacts to Egypt, there are two sides to the coin. Without the museums across the globe we would be void of learning material in all subjects. But having been in several Tombs and Temples that are empty because the contents are back in London, Berlin and the USA, this is also a sad state of affairs, I am sure that there will be many disappointed people in Cairo while the Tut-Ankh-Amun display is in the UK.

There is a middle ground, which is to return the artifacts to their origin and keep copies across the globe, and the benefit is that the whole world can have a set of copies.

The Cairo museum is also guilty of taking Egypts own treasures away from its people. K.H

Anonymous said...

The less we hear or see of Z.H., the better off everyone will be.